Expertise that matters. On Dewey’s understanding of relevant science

Autori

  • Antje Gimmler Aalborg University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4454/philinq.v8i2.306

Parole chiave:

Dewey, expertise, science, democracy, public sphere, C.S. Peirce, pragmatic maxim, fundamental and application-oriented research

Abstract

Expertise is much contested in modern democracies. In this article I shall investigate whether Dewey’s understanding of science and expertise provides us with some answers about the interplay between science, the public and society. Decisive for Dewey’s vision of the relation of democracy and science is that epistemic qualities and what he calls “organized intelligence” should contribute to find the best solutions for human wellbeing and growth. Science and expertise that can live up to this purpose are relevant from a pragmatic viewpoint. I shall suggest a reading of Peirce’s pragmatic maxim as a test for relevance that can be used to conceptualize a pragmatic version of science and expertise in the public interest.

##submission.downloads##

Pubblicato

2020-07-20

Fascicolo

V. 8 N. 2 (2020)

Sezione

Focus

Licenza

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work five (5) years after publication licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

After five years from first publication, Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.