Consequence Arguments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4454/philinq.v2i1.41Keywords:
free will, libertarianism, the consequence argumentAbstract
The Consequence Argument, in various forms, has been popular in recent discussions of libertarianism. I want to ask: what is the nature of the ‘necessity’ involved in the claim that necessarilyone cannot change the past or the laws of nature? I will answer that this necessity is not peculiar to the thesis of determinism and does not depend directly on the unchangeability of facts about the remote past; parallel consequence arguments can be constructed to show that libertarian free will is equally incompatible with indeterminism, fatalism, and naturalism.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
– Authors are allowed to upload their papers immediately after publication on reserved access institutional repositories or archives required for research metrics and evaluation. Authors ought to include publication references (journal title, volume, issue and pages, article DOI when available, URL to journal website or journal issue).
Issue files are only available for download by subscription for 18 months from the date of publication. After the embargo period, the content becomes open access and is subject to the Creative Commons Generic Licence version 4.0 (cc. By 4.0). Copyright in individual articles passes to the publisher on the date of publication of the article and reverts to the authors at the end of the embargo period.
If the author wishes to request immediate Open Access publication of his/her contribution, without waiting for the end of the embargo period, a fee of EUR 500.00 will be charged. To make this type of request, please contact our administrative office (amministrazione@edizioniets.com) and the journal manager (journals@edizioniets.com), indicating: the title of the article, the details of the file to which it belongs, the details of the person to whom the invoice should be addressed, the existence of any research funding.