A case for conservative ontology development in scientific metaphysics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4454/philinq.v10i1.295Keywords:
scientific metaphysics, representation, redundancy, ontologiesAbstract
Over the past decade, in contrast to the traditional analytic version of metaphysics, a brand of metaphysics that prioritizes collaboration and corroboration with sciences has emerged in the form of scientific metaphysics. While there has been a shift from the methodological dependence of analytic metaphysis on intuition, and conceptual analysis to the methodological preference for empirically-motivated metaphysical insights in scientific metaphysics, such a shift has not penetrated the foundational aims. Scientific metaphysics continues to probe the nature and structure of reality, much like its analytic counterpart and in this process, develops ontologies. Broadly two kinds of ontologies are furnished - global metaphysical ontologies and local scientific ontologies. In this paper, I highlight the challenges with developing such ontologies in scientific metaphysics. With Ladyman-Ross’ Information Theoretic Structural Realism as a case in point, I contest that the former suffers from representational indeterminacy and redundancy. Further, I note the possibility that eventually, local scientific ontologies might be replaced by scientific theories and in such a scenario, the former are best conceived as interim metaphysical supports for the latter.
References
Arenhart, Jonas R. B., 2017, “The received view on quantum non-individuality: formal and metaphysical analysis”, in Synthese, 194: 1323-1347.
Arenhart, Jonas R.B., and Otávio Bueno, 2015, “Structural realism and the nature of structure”, in European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5: 111-139.
Baker, David John, 2016, “The Philosophy of Quantum Field Theory”, in Oxford Handbooks Online, Oxford University Press.
Byrant, Amanda, 2020, “Keep the chickens cooped: the epistemic inadequacy of free-range metaphysics”, in Synthese, 197: 1867‑1887.
Brock, Stuart and Edwin Mares, 2007, Realism and Anti-Realism, Acumen Publishers, Durham.
Caulton, Adam, 2015, Issues of identity and individuality in quantum mechanics (Doctoral thesis), University of Cambridge, <https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/249007>.
Chakravartty, Anjan, 2010, “Metaphysics between the Sciences and Philosophies of Science”, in P.D. Magnus, J. Busch, eds., New Waves in Philosophy of Science, Palgrave MacMillan, London.
Chakravartty, Anjan, 2013, “On the Prospects of Naturalized Metaphysics” in Don Ross, James Ladyman, and Harold Kincaid, eds., Scientific Metaphysics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK: 27-51.
Churchland, Paul, 1981, “Eliminative Materialism and Propositional Attitudes”, in The Journal of Philosophy, 78, 2: 67-90.
Coopmans, Catelijne, Janet Vertesi, Michael E. Lynch, and Steve Woolgar, eds., 2014, Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Dennett, Daniel, 1991, “Real Patterns”, in The Journal of Philosophy, 88, 1: 27-51.
Devitt, Michael, 2008, “Realism/Anti-Realism”, in Stathis Psillos and Martin Curd, eds., The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Science, Routledge, London.
Dorr, Cian, 2010, “Review of James Ladyman and Don Ross, Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized”, in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 6, <https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/every-thing-must-go-metaphysics-naturalized/>.
French, Steven, Décio Krause, 2006, Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Heller, Mark, 2001, “Temporal Parts of Four-Dimensional Objects” in Michael J. Loux (ed.), Metaphysics: Contemporary Readings, Psychology Press, London.
Kuhlmann, Meinard, Holger Lyre, and Andrew Wayne, 2002, Ontological Aspects of Quantum Field Theory, World Scientific Press, Singapore.
Ladyman, James, 1998, “What is structural realism?”, in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 29, 3: 409-424.
Ladyman, James and Don Ross, 2007, Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Ladyman, James, 2009, “Weak Physicalism and Special Science Ontology”, in Alexander Hieke and Hanne Leitgeb, eds., Reduction, Abstraction, Analysis, Ontos Verlag, Germany.
Ladyman, James, 2012, “Science, Metaphysics and Method”, in Philosophical Studies, 160: 31-51
Ladyman, James, 2018, “Scientific Realism Again”, in Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science, 9, 1: 99-107.
Ladyman, James, Don Ross, 2013, “The World in the Data”, in Don Ross, James Ladyman, and Harold Kincaid, eds., Scientific Metaphysics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK: 108-150.
Laudan, Larry, Jarrett Leplin, 1991, “Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination”, in Journal of Philosophy, 88: 449-72.
Maclaurin, James, Heather Dyke, 2012, “What is analytic metaphysics for?”, in Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90, 2: 291-306.
Magnus, P.D., 2010, “Inductions, Red Herrings, and the Best Explanation for the Mixed Record of Science”, in British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61, 4: 803-819.
Melnyk, Andrew, 2013, “Can Metaphysics Be Naturalized? And If So, How?” in Don Ross, James Ladyman, Harold Kincaid, eds., Scientific Metaphysics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK: 79-95.
Mumford, Stephen, and Matthew Tugby, 2013, “What is the Metaphysics of Science?” in S. Mumford and M. Tugby, eds., Metaphysics and Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Nolan, Daniel, 2016, “Method in Analytic Metaphysics”, in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Methodology, Herman Cappelen, Tamar Szabo Gendler, John Hawthrone, eds., Oxford University Press, New York.
Norton, J, 2008, “Must Evidence Underdetermine Theory?”, in M. Carrier, D. Howard, and J. Kourany, eds., The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
Park, Seungbae, 2019, “How to Formulate Scientific Realism and Antirealism”, in Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 50, 4: 477-488.
Peirce, Charles Sanders, 1975, Charles Sanders Peirce: Contributions to The Nation. Volume 1, ed. by K.L. Ketner and J. Cook, Texas Tech University Press, Cambridge, Lubbock.
Soto, Cristian, 2015, “The Current State of The Metaphysics of Science Debate”, in Philosophica, 90, 23-60.
Soto, Cristian, 2017, “Globally and locally applied naturalistic metaphysics”, in Manuscrito, 90, 3: 33-50.
Stanford, P. Kyle, 2001, “Refusing the Devil’s Bargain: What Kind of Underdetermination Should We Take Seriously?”, in Philosophy of Science, 68, S3: s1-s12
Stanford, P. Kyle, Paul Humphreys, Katherine Hawley, James Ladyman, Don Ross, 2010, “Protecting rainforest realism”, in Metascience 19: 161-185.
Suárez, Mauricio, 2010, “Scientific Representation”, in Philosophy Compass, 5(1): 91‑101.
Thomasson, Amie L, 2007, “The Methods of Metaphysics”, in Ordinary Objects, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Thomasson, Amie L, 2012, “Research Problems and Methods in Metaphysics”, in The Continuum Companion to Metaphysics, Robert Barnard and Neil Manson, eds., Continuum International, New York.
Werndl, Charlotte, 2013, “On Choosing Between Deterministic and Indeterministic Models: Underdetermination and Indirect Evidence”, in Synthese, 190: 2243-2265.
Worrall, John, 1989, “Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds?”, in Dialectica, 43, 1: 99-124.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work five (5) years after publication licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
After five years from first publication, Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
